- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: Alternatives to Gnome3
- From: Steve Lindsay <stephen.a.lindsay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:48:32 +1100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VHQxVKXogtZ6AUz/rA9NYtIKGxmE08js4KzwWIFMBcE=; b=vHYgbO6tSyanPQOmRXvx57FzVSpQWNw7wgFYqkFyCpLlufki7B2FIEKme+4RwsvFB8 RKdhWeVAQUovi9zUl5hT/D6plUZ0n/8JRUqjHeUxRLbanjMgu2EEzJvhdNRWDSwj+l2n cTyc8wFHsNMToMz6hFDBXkYETajssGIm9Ad3E=
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Rod Butcher
<rbutcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I don't see how Gnome 3 being forced on folks who never asked for it meets above
> realworld rules.
>
Unless I misunderstand your point, I think "forced" is a bit strong.
There are more alternative window managers on linux than actual users.
--
- Steve (who likes Unity and is not ashamed to say so)