Tugger the SLUGger!SLUG Mailing List Archives

Re: [SLUG] IP cams behind NAT/ADSL


Voytek,

I don't see from the above where the "cam10" application is mapped from port
8010 to port 80 on the "cam10" device. That might be which nmap is showing
cam10 as filtered.


Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99@xxxxxxxxx


On 31 August 2011 15:32, Voytek Eymont <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On Wed, August 31, 2011 8:50 am, Martin Visser wrote:
>
> > if your cameras are say 192.168.1.101, 192.168.1.102, 192.168.1.103 you
> > need to setup a separate port forward for each, or application. So you
> > might create WebCam1 with Protocol TCP, Port 80 and Map to Host port
> 8101,
>
>
> Martin,
>
> thanks, one of my configs was incorrect (but the other one wasn't, [2wire,
> 2way bet]).
>
> OK, 2wire shows:
>
> Device  Allowed Applications    Application Type Protocol Port Public IP
> cacti   Web Server      -       TCP     80      111.222.333.444
>        SSH Server      -       TCP     22      111.222.333.444
> cam10   cam10   -       TCP     8010    111.222.333.444
>
> do I need to do anything in Apache conf on cacti above ?
>
> when I nmap I get:
>
> Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-08-31 14:57 EST
> Interesting ports on 111.222.333.444:
> Not shown: 995 closed ports
> PORT    STATE    SERVICE
> 22/tcp  open     ssh
> 80/tcp  open     http
> 139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
> 179/tcp filtered bgp
> 445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds
>
> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 48.59 seconds
>
> at one point whilst fiddling with different variants I noticed this:
>
> ---
> Not shown: 994 closed ports
> PORT     STATE    SERVICE
> 22/tcp   open     ssh
> 80/tcp   open     http
> 139/tcp  filtered netbios-ssn
> 179/tcp  filtered bgp
> 445/tcp  filtered microsoft-ds
> 8010/tcp filtered xmpp
> ---
>
> maybe.. whilst I was attempting to connect from browser..?
>
>
> --
> Voytek
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
>