Re: [SLUG] Re: XecureBrowser - looks like snake oil to me.

[Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Voytek Eymont" <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, November 11, 2010 11:38 am, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
>> It almost sounds like you are trying to disagree with me here, which seems
>> strange, given that the issue in the article was that it turns out people
>> with low levels of technical experience are vulnerable to social
>> manipulation.
>>
>> I can't quite tell if you are disagreeing or not, though, which is
>> strange. :)
>
> agree with you, and, appreciate your concise summary of the XecureBrowser,
> likewise, I followed up the XecureBrowser link.  yes, that's what I meant,
> "here's another example"

Ah.  Sorry for the confusion, then. :)

> sorry for not making it more obvious.

I don't know I would, personally, assume that it was your side that slipped
here.  I am happy to say that this is not my most ... focused of days. ;)

        Daniel

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman            ✉ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx            ☎ +61 401 155 707
               ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons