SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] Re: XecureBrowser - looks like snake oil to me.
- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: XecureBrowser - looks like snake oil to me.
- From: Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:21:21 +1100
- Reply-to: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin)
"Voytek Eymont" <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, November 11, 2010 11:38 am, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> It almost sounds like you are trying to disagree with me here, which seems
>> strange, given that the issue in the article was that it turns out people
>> with low levels of technical experience are vulnerable to social
>> I can't quite tell if you are disagreeing or not, though, which is
>> strange. :)
> agree with you, and, appreciate your concise summary of the XecureBrowser,
> likewise, I followed up the XecureBrowser link. yes, that's what I meant,
> "here's another example"
Ah. Sorry for the confusion, then. :)
> sorry for not making it more obvious.
I don't know I would, personally, assume that it was your side that slipped
here. I am happy to say that this is not my most ... focused of days. ;)
✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx ☎ +61 401 155 707
♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons