Re: [SLUG] Re: XecureBrowser - looks like snake oil to me.

["Voytek Eymont" <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, November 11, 2010 11:38 am, Daniel Pittman wrote:

> It almost sounds like you are trying to disagree with me here, which
> seems strange, given that the issue in the article was that it turns out
> people with low levels of technical experience are vulnerable to social
> manipulation.
>
> I can't quite tell if you are disagreeing or not, though, which is
> strange. :)

agree with you, and, appreciate your concise summary of the XecureBrowser,
likewise, I followed up the XecureBrowser link

yes, that's what I meant, "here's another example"

I just came across the NY article last night, when I saw your post,
thought, hmmm, maybe the virus eradicator from NY now joined SLUG, as the
post was still fresh in my mind (and opened in a TAB) I thought of posting
from it

sorry for not making it more obvious.

-- 
Voytek