- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] WordPress & sessions [Was: WordPress, PHP]
- From: Amos Shapira <amos.shapira@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 09:30:25 +1000
- Cc: richard.ibbotson@xxxxxxxxx, slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=jL+g7qEuwz/xkR+X7lGgg+UVmUiYXrVCy1Cp+xF7dXs=; b=UjahHo6Ph7OR2y2uu+4ALuoHOS+np0JtF1mhzt4hJuzIXMTKqQYHW6gMPHezwW2Nm5 lNlQDHEdj80HDFi4msVerK8F65BSVzPPc9E6ISBPPNtzXL6SpfV54ySTBqGqeT1v73vm FmSlvbnG1HFxSCWKE/momUwoW6AxbxNCEZ358=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=u8WWGTpbUGdfpMLVERnWE1tVDdBbAIKqSJQxPFvJ6liyYivdanp3pVtEezqSU6uRtv nYXRwGur5Diha2DioxeUAFGpobcCE4yMW551getglV1sTVGjB8Wjm+HyY8L1fjkBNiXg wO6Rg1wZYUGN5Zzud40TvkgBwPGidSfYmrFFI=
On 8 May 2010 15:48, Jeff Waugh <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <quote who="justin randell">
> > was it a desire to use a non-file based store and an aversion to using
> > custom session handlers? was it a desire to control the strength of the
> > cookie hash?
Without getting into WordPress or the session storage options it
provides - In principle I'd prefer none-file-based permanent session
store simply to allow multiple front server to share the load of
serving any session from any server.
This usually leads to client-server style databases or things like
memcachedb in redundant configuration.
--Amos
SLUG Mailing List Archives