- To: lists@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] ftp client recomendations ?
- From: Amos Shapira <amos.shapira@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:29:21 +1000
- Cc: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6T/WLk09ep6uqQNEtwtnlZxQUa3IclILfjBsMHvkavA=; b=sTD+xVwMwackEYhHM+XKuhEN2PjJUKtYvbiz+3884/wNjhjDX7KGmNPiRhi80hzJTh nZW3oZF4viG10fkovyw3KtvGe8nkw9tNFrdMWGo6ks/fHzJdB/2toCOqdzP70XWXA2PA +9B5qX4wIozLqvsQLikBm6nnztUahHYOn0Rr8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KQENijUKFy7fygWVhYrING01aIy7Sd5z6NRRItMvaUmga0G/Zq9xCc8a3mv2L2GMhJ 6NZVz0x76k8N/lOly+Wdiq1+XAiWJKcFuqhQp3k8tS16a2uwZDfa/tzZ/2VKGqyz3Lap FwZbjD6nwfmImkOK/Qqg3zS+4YKYqtNlyZFBQ=
2009/8/20 Voytek Eymont <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Bottom line, ftp is a pretty firewall un-friendly protocol.
>> I'd recommend sftp (i.e. the module/feature of ssh) instead.
>
>
> but, if command line ftp client works with no issues, doesn't that exclude
> firewall on the server ?
>
> the ftpd and fwall have been unmodified pretty well since 1st installed
Close.
The main possible difference I can see is the use of passive
connections - could be that one of them uses them and the other
doesn't and that could make the whole difference.
Try to make the clients more verbose, or sniff the traffic with
Wireshark (use "follow TCP connection" to get a very easy-to-read
trace of the command stream).
Cheers,
--Amos
SLUG Mailing List Archives