Re: [SLUG] Linux "clustering" - what are the options?

[Dean Hamstead <dean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

given the samba-oriented nature of dazza's query,
in addition to linux-ha take a look at

http://ctdb.samba.org/

i believe this is the sort of system you are after?

Dean

Sonia Hamilton wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 11:44 +1000, DaZZa wrote:
> > Does the Linux world support the concept of active/passive (passive
> > node takes over if active fails) clustering for this kind of
> > situation? Or even active/active (both nodes answer requests depending
> > on load)?
>
> http://www.linux-ha.org/
>
> -  
> Thanks,
> .
> Sonia Hamilton
> http://www.snowfrog.net
> http://training.snowfrog.net
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/soniahamilton
> .
> Your manuscript is both good and original; but the part that is good is
> not original and the part that is original is not good - Samuel Johnson.

--
http://fragfest.com.au