SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] Linux "clustering" - what are the options?
- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Linux "clustering" - what are the options?
- From: Sonia Hamilton <sonia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 11:50:36 +1000
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 11:44 +1000, DaZZa wrote:
> Does the Linux world support the concept of active/passive (passive
> node takes over if active fails) clustering for this kind of
> situation? Or even active/active (both nodes answer requests depending
> on load)?
Your manuscript is both good and original; but the part that is good is
not original and the part that is original is not good - Samuel Johnson.