Re: [SLUG] What is suspicous?

[Sridhar Dhanapalan <sridhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 at 12:31, Jeff Waugh <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I figure the Mailman developers chose not to include further information so
> as to avoid giving evildoers an immediate hint towards an easy workaround
> to suit their evil purposes. :-)

Security through obscurity, eh? :p 

> The singularity beckons. :-)

Not while it's under a 'Non-Commercial Academic Use Only' licence, thanks. :p 


-- 
"Both the UNIX kernel, and the design techniques it encourages, are renowned 
for stability. A system of several thousand servers must run reliably and 
without intervention to restart failed systems"
	- Microsoft, 'Converting a UNIX .COM Site to Windows', 2000-22-08

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.