- To: Mary Gardiner <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: Wireless problems: what does "RX too short data frame payload" mean?
- From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:23:50 +0900
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> Looks like it might be their problem, right now. I'd still like to find
> out what causes the RX message, as my disk has to wake up all the time
> to write it out to the logs.
There's at least a minimum frame size in Ethernet; I'd not be surprised
if Wireless Ethernet had similar restrictions.
Encrypted sessions generally pad frames out so the original packet size can't
be gleaned. ISTR even WEP did this.
Just find the line and insert a NUL character or NOP instructions appropriately ?:)
Adrian