SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] SSH attack
- To: Slug <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] SSH attack
- From: "Amos Shapira" <amos.shapira@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:04:57 +1000
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kpP57c2dkGSPAF8RIkRqYFarUMTRiGIJaFmD/GxFhb+cnleuki7mfgiaZ9Zx/babINJgPBfvTDUadFd1PnAAF/lufuq8DaO/tUeEdw2tSRWKZx7tiqWzhV3TpRKjR6T75mnFTK5GwhmQ2rfmIJCCeofM12Gs250UJU640Dk2nY4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=idxoLIxX2+ineY2UX2tJj76hIaPP6rClCehJk1/K2hBOo5wKrTFvi1tzirHQ1Xj4DGLIrLSfsDtzTf1Kx+X9J0nNqXmCr+bl677O6vMnh8rmLTWe+6zt0BCU5kea3liWt85Ef/XRDt4udZcRaoil89nQewdd909XQbVGJluNkVw=
On 03/08/07, Morgan Storey <morganstorey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I prefer to use something like denyhosts to simply block the offending
> as moving the port seems somewhat to be security through obscurity.
Yes it is. But it keeps your logs much cleaner (so any attempt to hack is
noticed much more easily, not that I've seen any since I moved the port) and
doesn't prevent you from using denyhosts still.