- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [SLUG] Re: Linux UI decision
- From: "hav" <havorama@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:00:23 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:x-http-useragent:mime-version:content-type; b=nKLAoRtFK126v59P8Jz6RsrLdwOz6/xY8ecl7mq1x1yOnTuHiBDqPOMbeGWPspy8HgIqji4yoQUZ6Fk59UOP91SwmQB1niepwNdptbisoiQha9Hq5Zkwr4EEDSkugInaTBbpwoAMtp/zx+OQN8Hg4BS5E3yet8ebKCb/+qrtbVc=
- User-agent: G2/1.0
Thanks for the responses - I dare say I have shown my ignorance,
however it is a steep learning curve, moving from dos/windows. A
couple more questions from your responses: what is the gnome/gtk+
relationship? I use kde, but my interesest is piqued due to the
article on Englightenment - that is E17 yeah? Oh - do you intertwine
your additions to E17 with a day job? That to me would be a dream job,
having been a visual c developer for so long and just spent a year.5
back studying - I can't imagine trying to port a Qt project to mfc or
the like. Ych! That would be more than 10% in porting I can tell you!
Still, its not that dissimilar. This leads to another question: about
the not referring to "desktop shell" anymore - how is E17 different to
other window managers - I read an article in Linux User I think, but I
forget, and now I can't imagine, unless it does not adopt a traditional
process/kernel model - I would like to see a linux microkernel
architecture, that would get the porting down to 2%!
Cheers
HAV