SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] Some Thoughts Regarding Spam
- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Some Thoughts Regarding Spam
- From: Penedo <penedo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:43:23 +1100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=IzTlRBO4jnJV7Q1QNYtnoO5/YbrYGvVRH3rECvGn/8rcZQZSZkATUwf1dMIFvwC3Q6P0hA+mygtpCtgxeV+Jx2XTpB4zpakCtTsrDODw317dl8zKp3Ydsp3HeO8KQs/kgtbHT25OnsT5EKPZqjkG6L3cCG2CESXDfn8zX+GhQNA=
On 06/11/06, Rev Simon Rumble <simon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not sure the spam has increased, just it's currently able to get
through the filters more. It's an arms race and, at this point in time,
the spammers are winning.
Actually, from having access to the records of a major ISP (though not being
involved in the details) there IS a significant upsurge in the amount of
spam sent over the last couple of months.