- To: "Kevin Fitzgerald" <kev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Hardware Question
- From: "Howard Lowndes" <lannet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:24:10 +1000 (EST)
- Cc: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-5.fc5
IMO, for what you are talking about, both machines are over-spec'd. Email
is not time critical and 12 users and Samba will hardly cause any box to
crack a sweat - we're not talking Windows here. If I had this situation I
would use the 1GHz box, pull out 1Gb of RAM and sell it to recoup some of
the costs. Win - win all round.
On Sun, April 30, 2006 12:02, Kevin Fitzgerald wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am building a Production FC4 box with Scalix (www.scalix.com) for use in
> a
> small site (12 users). The site is My church and I don't have Bucketloads
> of
> $$ to spend but I have two available boxes to build on.
>
> 1Ghz Celeron with 1.5Gb SDRAM (3 slots)
> 2.8Ghz P4 with 1Gb SDRAM (2 Slots)
>
> Now the question is this. For running Scalix (Mail server) and general
> Samba
> stuff. Am I better to lean towards the Faster Processor with Less RAM or
> do
> I go with the More RAM but slower Processor? From what I understand I
> cannot
> buy SDRAM in sticks bigger than 512Mb so each Box is Maxxed out.
>
> Can anyone give me an educated opinion on what the best to do is?
>
> Ta
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Fitzgerald
> TCG TECHNOLOGIES
>
> Skype: kevtcg
> MSN: kev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mobile: 0412 404 002
> Web: www.tcgtech.com.au
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
>
>
--
Howard
LANNet Computing Associates <http://lannet.com.au>
When you want a computer system that works, just choose Linux;
When you want a computer system that works, just, choose Microsoft.