RE: WAS: RE: [SLUG] Invalid credentials error code 49

["Selim Jahangir" <s.jahangir@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Guys
May I ask you about fc2? Is it equivalent to REL2? 

Cheers
selim

-----Original Message-----
From: slug-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:slug-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Matthew Hannigan
Sent: Monday, 24 April 2006 9:51 AM
To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: WAS: RE: [SLUG] Invalid credentials error code 49

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:31:07AM +1000, O Plameras wrote:
> Tony Green wrote:
> > [ .. ]
> >You didn't say "you can't" you said "This is not true that you can". 
> 
> Right that's what I said. "This is not true that you can" does not 
> [ .. ]

'can' and 'cannot' and 'may' and 'may not' are
problematical.

If you want to be clearer in talking about standards
(and since we happen to be talking about standards)

you may want to take note of 
	http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2119.html
:-)

Seriously, it's helped me more than once at
work.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html