SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] Re: DNS - Xen - Virtual server hosting
- To: Ben Buxton <bb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: DNS - Xen - Virtual server hosting
- From: Matthew Hannigan <mlh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:14:57 +1100
- Cc: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/22.214.171.124i
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:51:52PM +0100, Ben Buxton wrote:
> Howard Lowndes <lannet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> uttered the following thing:
> > I know about BIND views, in fact I use them, but I don't think they will
> > work here.
> > What I need is for lannet.com.au, thisdomain.tld and thatdomain.tld to
> > all resolve to the same public w.x.y.z externally, but be DNAT'd to
> > different private 192.168.y.z addresses internally.
> You want to use something called 'pound'. I use it to do exactly what
> you ask.
> One binary, one configuration file. Piece of cake.
Looks great, but it's equivalent to my suggestion to
use Apache with name virtual hosts and mod_proxy.
Howard wants something for all (?) protocols, which is
impossible in principle because you don't know which
name they want in general -- all the server gets is