- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Fedora vs RH Enterprise - consultants advising to change
- From: "Voytek Eymont" <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:27:44 +1100 (EST)
- Reply-to: lists@xxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]
On Thu, January 26, 2006 12:03 am, O Plameras wrote:
> Simon wrote:
>> AT the risk of starting a flamewar.....I am being advised by
>> consultants that I need to 'upgrade' my Fedora Core servers to RH
>> Enterprise as it
>> is 'more robust', 'better supported', 'easier to upgrade' etc etc. We are
>> currently running them as our webserver (informational only - no
>> transactions), mailserver and intranet webserver (this one is a bit
>> slow, but just needs more RAM).
if I can jump in on this thread: I'm somewhat perplexed by all the
different RH offerings: AS, ES, workstation, desktop:
if all I need is a simple web/mail server with Apache/MySQL/PHP/BIND
stuff: can I get a (lower cost) workstation edition ? and run it as
web/mail server ? or, it will not get updates for Apache/Mysql/PHP ? or ?
--
Voytek