- To: Voytek <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] WRT54g Speedboost ?
- From: Michael Fox <fox.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:20:15 +1100
- Cc: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ja0jx7XQ5aQzRZrvgie0ck+YoEKmHkLfkEjbqv3M8Em2LIkXyAshsUj+1X6Giotr4SdBHA+elEJo0ftTZ2gfbfoMDVN8TpTYDJuMSdE6U1GgArscDuv/qcD0i/qIKR2sIQjRFzM0r3oHytR4OOCTIlSqctkIPMf8f9R+i2X8zrk=
- Reply-to: Michael Fox <fox.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:16:57 +1100 (EST), Voytek <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <quote who="Michael Fox">
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:23:28 +1100 (EST), Voytek <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Michael, Jeff, thanks
>
> > WAG54G = wireless router/adsl modem all in one
> > WRT54G = wireless router (with wan ports to add ADSL or cable ethernet
> > modem)
> > WAP54G = wireless access point.
>
> Michael,
> one aspect I still can't understand, in the context of wireless access,
> what is the advantage of WAP unit over WAG or WRT ? either WAG or WRT give
> me wireless access point, no ?
Sorry, I don't understand your question. If you just want an AP device
on your lan to allow for some wireless clients, then you could use a
WAP or a WRT. The WRT is cheaper, and with sveasoft firmware can be
configured to be a wireless access point. Plus still have grunt to do
some other fancy things. It would allow you to have your wireless
client on a different IP range and then route this onto the existing
lan.