- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] NTFS vs EXT3
- From: Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd-slug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:10:23 +1000
- Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:31:21 +1000
James Gregory <james@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Performance wise, I would expect NTFS to
> be faster.
I don't remember where I read it, but I remember reading that NTFS
significantly slower than EXT2. Not sure about EXT3.
> EXT2/3 pre-date the current balanced tree fad that
> filesystems are currently going through.
So does NTFS which has been around at least since NT 3.5.
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Linux, the UNIX defragmentation tool.