SLUG Mailing List Archives - Re: [SLUG] difference between VNV and tightVNC?

To: slug <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [SLUG] difference between VNV and tightVNC?
From: Ken Foskey <foskey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:18:59 +1000

On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 15:43, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

> I suppose that I'll now have to give tightVNC a go since it seems
> to be an improved version of VNC.

general info...

Less bugs and a lossy compression option that I have used across a
modem.  Both the client and server have to be tightvnc but they
interoperate with vnc clients and servers as well.

-- 
Thanks
KenF
OpenOffice.org developer

References:
- [SLUG] Re: [nylug-talk] remote desktop on linux accessing windows xp
  - From: Luke (Terry) Vanderfluit
- Re: [SLUG] difference between VNV and tightVNC?
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [SLUG] difference between VNV and tightVNC?
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] DOWNGRADING Redhat9 and RedhatEL3 from "httpd 2" to "Apache 1.3" to install freeside
Previous by thread: Re: [SLUG] difference between VNV and tightVNC?
Next by thread: [SLUG] decss xine