SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] habeas compliant spam
- To: lists@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] habeas compliant spam
- From: mlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 10:10:51 +1000
- Cc: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 10:42:58PM +1000, lists@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Matt, yes, I've read the faq, and, submitted the spam, but... it kinda
> seems like a somewhat flawed idea ?
> hence, I was curious
I _suspect_ that habeas does not actually give _anyone_
a licence, so the only users are those spammers who
are thus contravening the license, opening themselves
up to legal action.
Even it were not so, I think it's a worthwhile idea.
There is some, very little but _some_ unsolicited
commercial email that I do not mind receiving.
It's all voluntary, and if you don't want any
spam you could reject on the habeas headers
instead of accept.