SLUG Mailing List Archives

Re: [SLUG] blocking port 80 on firewall.

To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [SLUG] blocking port 80 on firewall.
From: Mary Gardiner <mary-slug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 21:41:52 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Sun, May 02, 2004, Keith Hopkins wrote:
>   Instead of blocking port 80, you could also consider redirecting it
>   to the port used by squid.

Or possibly put up a minimal web-page using one of the minimalist
servers, that explains how to turn the proxy on. That's halfway between
transparent proxy and packet dropping in terms of use.

-Mary

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLUG] blocking port 80 on firewall.
  - From: Grant Parnell

References:
- [SLUG] squidguard not working.
  - From: Ken Foskey
- [SLUG] Re: squidguard not working.
  - From: Ken Foskey
- [SLUG] blocking port 80 on firewall.
  - From: Ken Foskey
- Re: [SLUG] blocking port 80 on firewall.
  - From: Keith Hopkins

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [SLUG] Kernel panic: 2.6.5.-1-686 boot probs.
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] Kernel panic: 2.6.5.-1-686 boot probs.
Previous by thread: Re: [SLUG] blocking port 80 on firewall.
Next by thread: Re: [SLUG] blocking port 80 on firewall.