- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] who wrote the most code?
- From: Jamie Wilkinson <jaq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:42:46 +1100
- Reply-by: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:20:56 +1100
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
This one time, at band camp, Benno wrote:
>On Tue Feb 24, 2004 at 19:21:53 +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>>This one time, at band camp, Robert Collins wrote:
>>>On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 19:10, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> P.S. your (and Micksa's) email clients are broken.
>>>
>>>Oh? In what way?
>>
>>(You're doing it again! :-)
>>
>>Your replies are going to the list and to me, which suggests that your
>>mail client doesn't acknowledge the Mail-Followup-To header.
>
>Which RFC is that in? Or is it just a DJBism?
It's not in an RFC, afaik. I didn't know it was a djbism, that sucks
:-) (but then you use Maildir).
Googling for "rfc mail-followup-to" seems to have a few useful links
about it, and it seems there's a group strongly opposing its use too
(that is, until something like usenet's Followup-To from RFC 1036).
--
jaq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg