- To: mlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: DSPAM vs SpamAssassin FYI
- From: Andrew Cowie <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:47:47 +1100
- Cc: SLUG <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: Operational Dynamics
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 10:33, mlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> As unfortunate as it is, I think the only way to combat
> spam is to make it expensive to send by default.
As it happens, Microsoft, Yahoo, and {some major ISPs} are trying to
figure a way to implement "Internet Postage".
http://www.technewsworld.com/perl/story/32760.html
They say they are advocating this because of the anti-spam effect it
would have.
I leave it as an exercise to the reader what possible ulterior
commercial motives might be present.
AfC