SLUG Mailing List Archives

To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virus scanningbounce strategy]
From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:30:48 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

<quote who="lists@xxxxxxxxxx">

> do you have checks that detect mydoom in ZIPs ? I've put the checks that
> were on the Postfix list, but, I'm still getting a lot of 30k zips
> through.

Are you using this one (body check)?

  /^UEsDBAoAAAAAA/   DISCARD W32.MyDoom.A

- Jeff

-- 
GVADEC 2004: Kristiansand, Norway                    http://2004.guadec.org/
 
       The implementation of any sufficiently advanced technology is
                        indistinguishable from pr0n.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virusscanningbounce strategy]
  - From: lists

References:
- [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virus scanning bounce strategy]
  - From: Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virus scanningbounce strategy]
  - From: lists

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [SLUG] how does one kill an unwanted tty
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virus scanning bounce strategy]
Previous by thread: Re: [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virus scanningbounce strategy]
Next by thread: Re: [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virusscanningbounce strategy]

Re: [SLUG] Mid-DATA spam/AV detection considered harmful [Was: Virus scanningbounce strategy]