SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] samba 3.0?
- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] samba 3.0?
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:48:37 +1100
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
<quote who="DE LUCA Ben">
> Any one want to describe any hellish issues with it? I want to use it as
> an alternative method for accessing my server, I run samba2 on a different
> machine for (>99%) of my users. But AD intergration is a holey grail!
> How unstable is it?
Big name vendors have been shipping 2.99 versions of it for quite some time
now. It's way stable, definitely not .0 quality. :-)
linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/