- To: Luke Burton <luke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Redundant Web Servers
- From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 07:37:32 +0100 (IST)
- Cc: jon@xxxxxxxxx
- Cc: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
> through for instance.
>
> A good compromise might be to have a 'forwarder' machine hosted on a
> highly available, redundant network of your choosing. You make sure
> that the logic in this thing is as simple as possible, so that there is
> a minimised risk of it going wrong. You pay a few $$ to make sure that
> it's on failover hardware, redundant net connections, etc.
I think ideally you round-robin DNS a couple of these also...
Dave.
--
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied@xxxxxxxxx
pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
SLUG Mailing List Archives