SLUG Mailing List Archives
RE: [SLUG] home server on adsl; advice
- To: "Chris D." <wazza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [SLUG] home server on adsl; advice
- From: "Minh Van Le" <mvanle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 02:04:45 +1000
Correct me if I'm wrong, but having two firewalls is better than one.
One for the DSL modem that is exposed to the internet, and then a separate
firewall for the internal lan that is only exposed to the DSL firewall is
better than firewalling everything from 1 box. It may delay a compromise and
make tracking logs easier.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: slug-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:slug-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Chris D.
> Sent: Sunday, 1 June 2003 19:10
> To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] home server on adsl; advice
> This one time, at band camp, Amanda Wynne wrote:
> >I'm looking at getting an Alcatel Pro. Currently running a P120
> with Freesco
> >via dialup.
> I'd recomend the DSL-300 from D-Link. There it maintains the
> authentication and you just plugin a cat5 crossover to your system.
> On the system it's connected to, you just use dhcp to configure the IP
> address on it.
> >What I'm thinking of doing, if it's possible (this was going to
> be my next
> >question) is change the Freesco box to bridge mode, feeding the
> alcatel, with
> >my web server (yet another box) hanging off the alcatel. That
> way my Lan is
> >effectively double-firewalled.
> 'double-firewalled' is really not going to mean much.
> I refuse to say free-->SCO<-- is a good idea.
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug