SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] SpamAssassain again
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] SpamAssassain again
- From: Howard Lowndes <lannet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu May 30 22:18:02 2002
- Cc: Mail List - SLUG <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Howard Lowndes">
> > I tested by piping a spam email into spamassassin and it was correctly
> > mangled and output into my mailbox (or to stdout if I use the -t
> > argument). If I try to pipe it into spamc though it comes out unmangled
> > and returns an exit code of 0 (not spam).
> > I guess the next thing to check is that the spamd daemon is actually
> > finding its config files, but has anyone else got any other ideas.
> spamc run from procmail will use *your* configuration files, ie:
> rewrite_subject 0
> report_header 1
> use_terse_report 1
> skip_rbl_checks 1
> check_mx_attempts 0
> I choose not to mangle, because I filter on "X-Spam-Flag: YES" instead of
> making the emails grody.
I hear what you say, and I have $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs set up with
some arguments. spamd is running as root, I am running spamc as root, but
still it won't do its thing when I test it.
Are you saying that procmail, and hence spamc, gets run as the account
that is the RCPT of the email or as the user running sendmail/procmail.
LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people
Contact detail at http://www.lannetlinux.com
"Life is like a hot bath - it's great when you're in it,
but the longer you stay the more wrinkled you become."