SLUG Mailing List Archives
LSB 1.0 (was Re: [SLUG] From newbie to...)
- To: "'slug@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: LSB 1.0 (was Re: [SLUG] From newbie to...)
- From: Tom Massey <tom_massey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Jul 2 22:04:02 2001
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:52:08PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Heracles">
> > SO yes, a talk on partitioning would be useful as long as it is NOT
> > hijacked by the poor deluded Debian junkies ;-P
Interesting point there. We don't seem to have had any discussion on slug
about the recent LSB 1.0. (Presumably in this context that LSB 1.0 doesn't
look so great to 'Debian junkies', certainly a number of people on
debian-user have complained about the preferencing of rpm over deb, even
if they clearly have little knowledge of rpm :-).
Vaguely throwing out the question:
What do people think of the LSB 1.0 standards?
(Wallow around at <http://www.linuxbase.org> if you need more info).