SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] Seg fault due to swap file
- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Seg fault due to swap file
- From: Paul Cameron <1paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Feb 27 07:56:02 2001
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
If the file was of immense size, then Rick would probably have
mentioned it. It's like a customer omitting the line
"and by the way, my monitor is on fire" when getting helpdesk
to try and troubleshoot why it doesn't work.
Besides, who in their right mind has 2G files they would class
as a "document".
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:57:37PM +1100, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
> Was it a very large file ? Google returned this
> on a searching for:
> talking about the 2G addressing limit.
> Rick Welykochy wrote:
> > I'm sitting pretty quitely paging through a document in vim and
> > the poor thing barfs:
> > Vim: Caught deadly signal SEGV
> > Vim: Double signal, exiting
> > Close error on swap file
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > Any ideas why? Bad block in the swap area?
> > A tribute to Linux: I snooped around, rm'd up the core dump,
> > checked a few other processes, and went back into vi with
> > no probs. Total interruption time: 2 minutes (and a scratched
> > skull). 48 hours later, the box is still chugging along with
> > narry a worry, no reboot, xstart or other panic.
> > Now let's see W2K do that!
> > -rickw