SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] Results of Completely Unscientific New List Vote
- To: <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] Results of Completely Unscientific New List Vote
- From: "Dan Treacy" <treacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Feb 7 23:52:01 2001
- Organization: 5262 IT
- Reply-to: "Dan Treacy" <treacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I still think if we'd call it [slug-beer] and made it a dicussion list for
where we were drink next it'd have passed unanimously :-)
Btw I hearby claim that's the voting was confusing I meant to vote for
Gore.. an appeal willbe lodged!
> <quote who="Terry Collins">
> > You must have done something to tip it off. Both the Worms and I voted
> > from the same machine.
> Craige said later that 'there's always one'.
> He was right -> but it wasn't him.
> - Jeff
> -- jdub@xxxxxxxxxxx -------------------------------
> Ye shall be cursed to fall in love so easily, and yet be so cold of
> heart as never to express it.
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug