- To: Bill Hiley <Bill.Hiley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] win4lin
- From: DaZZa <dazza@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Sep 25 17:05:23 2000
- Cc: "'slug@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Bill Hiley wrote:
> For those of us poor souls who (occasionally of course) have to run a
> Windows program - does anyone have any experience with 'Win4Lin' and can
> offer any comparison with other products eg. Vmware, Wine etc
VMWare _rocks_. The current version is completely stable, and I love it.
I've got it installed at work - standard machines are P3/650's with 256
meg of RAM and a 15 gig HD. Running Winblows98 on these boxes resulted in
either out of resource errors, or GPF's at least daily.
I installed one box with SuSE 6.4, stuck VMWare on it, installed Winblows
under it {with all my required software}, logged into the LAN and away we
went. Now, Winblows98 is _MORE_ reliable under VMWare/Linux than it was
native! No joke. Less GPF's, and the resource problem isn;t an issue,
because I can run the program which chewed the resources under Linux,
where it doesn't use anywhere near as much.
I can't sing VMWare's praises enough. Especially since the boss paid for
it. :)
DaZZa