SLUG Mailing List ArchivesOn Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:58:05PM +1100, Adrian van den Dries wrote: > Wrote John: > > > > The 100M versions of the card need the newer driver which only > > ships with 2.4. It may ship with some distributions if the distro has > > specifically compiled the right version in. > > > > Perhaps that explains the 'poor' performance of that card. It's a 10/100 but > I guess it's only being driven at 10Mbps. Is this correct, because as I > said, I've never had 'trouble'? Peter, is it the standard kernel module that > isn't recognizing your card? How's your modules.conf? A standard Debian 2.2 install was failing to recognise the card, modprobe'ing the driver failed with an error about specifying a base address and irq. As I've already said elsewhere, I think it may be a slightly different revision of the card. On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:40:12AM +1100, John Ferlito wrote: > Had to do this a while ago. Now from memory do the following > Go back to the via-rhine web page and there should be a link to > pci-scan.[ch] you need these as well then use the following to compile. These are at http://www.scyld.com/network/updates.html, and you also need to get the kern_compat.h file. There's also instructions there to compile the pci-scan and driver modules. If anybody's interested I actually just put all the files in my /usr/src/linux/drivers/net directory, and modified the Makefile there to make sure pci-scan was being built as a module. Tried building it into the kernel following the instructions on the site, but linking failed because of mismatched symbols in pci-scan. Thankyou John and Adrian. Peter pjha297@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgprGJPcb1wQU.pgp
Description: PGP signature