SLUG Mailing List Archives
RE: [SLUG] File systems and redundency
- To: "'George Vieira'" <georgev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [SLUG] File systems and redundency
- From: grant@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu Sep 14 10:38:23 2000
- Reply-to: <grant@xxxxxxxxxx>
I know of the following
1 Speed - Back in the days when you had squeese every thing out of that
disk, you would put particular partitions in particular places on the disk.
For example /tmp or swap should be put on the fastest parts of the disk whil
/home can be put on the slower parts.
2 Security - Some Denial of service type attacks can generate huge logs on
your system. In the extreme case these logs could take up your whole disk
leaving no way for your system to do any thing and cause a crash. These logs
are normally stored in /var so "they" recommend having a partition for /var.
Four J's Asia Pacific
Ph: +61 2 8912 4170
Fax: +61 2 8912 4179
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Vieira [mailto:georgev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 September 2000 10:22
> To: 'slug@xxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [SLUG] File systems and redundency
> Hi all,
> I was just wondering why is it so crucial to have different
> mount points on
> a unix system? Eg. create /, /usr , /tmp , /home
> Why is it so much better to have multiple partitions instead of having
> everything mounted as (/) root?
> Sure some times the file system could crash and at least it's
> only 1 file
> system and root or /home or /usr is still OK but what other
> reasons are
> there? Speed? Fragmentation? Etc.....
> George Vieira
> Network Administrator
> PGP Fingerprint : 43DC 92AC 1A82 27B2 E97B 52F1 B60F
> 301A 38A9 A10C
> PGP KeyID: 0x38A9A10C
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug