SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] pppd problems this time (8-(
- To: John Ferlito <johnf@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] pppd problems this time (8-(
- From: Howard Lowndes <lannet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Aug 31 06:49:53 2000
- Cc: Mail List - SLUG <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mail List - CLUG <linux@xxxxxxxxx>
I doffs me hat to you John, the noauth did it.
I do need the specific IPs tho in order to know the route to find the pppd
connection so that it can be brought up on demand.
LANNet Computing Associates <http://www.lannet.com.au>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, John Ferlito wrote:
> > when it offers the address 126.96.36.199 and we ack the offer, but then 8
> > lines further down we are told that the peer is not authorised to use the
> > remote address, the one it has just offered as the remote. From that
> > point down the wheels fall off.
> Try throwing in the noauth option. Tels pppd that the other side
> doesn't need to do any authentication.
> Also you shouldn't need to specify the IP's. That way if Telstra change the ip of
> the remote end everything will keep working fine.