SLUG Mailing List Archives
Re: [SLUG] multihomed machine.
- To: slug@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SLUG] multihomed machine.
- From: marty <marty@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Aug 22 13:35:04 2000
> >but, i can't see why you would want to bind one routable and one
> >unroutable address to the one card... :-?
> Well I have run short of IP Addresses, I only have a measly C Class, and
> need more, so I am going to make a private range, existing on the same
> ethernet segment, NAT'd or Squid'ed (haven't decided) to the registered
> addresses, including internet.
> The NAT/squid machine is the one with the two ip addresses obviously.
ahhh... i have it figured... you need a second IP for <whatever is
performing NAT> and squid to listen to, and seeing as it won't need to be
visible to the routable internet, you might as well not waste a routable
I should put my brain in gear more often...
"I can't buy what I want because it's free. Can't be what they want
because I'm me." - Corduroy, Pearl Jam