Re: [chat] re mail

[Yama <sridhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Andrew Robertson <arobcorp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> tell me, if someone is looking after the email system, then they have an
> obligation to come forward if asked, but, alas, there has been no reply,
> and no responce, thus meaning a lack of culpability!, there can be no other
> conclusion drawn!

John already answered that question:

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: [chat] moderation
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007
From: John Ferlito <johnf@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Andrew Robertson <arobcorp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:49:51PM +1000, Andrew Robertson wrote:
> who is doing the moderation for the committee list and who is doing the 
spam-assasin/sendmail for the committee list

The committee list isn't moderated at all. Emails go straight to the
committee members unless they are marked as SPAM.

Spamassassin is automated for all lists and moderates anything it
thinks is SPAM, unless the score is high enough to merit
dropping it.

Cheers,

-- 
John
http://www.inodes.org/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-------------------------------------------------------


-- 
"Sure, but it's kinda funny, we are using a Mac to design our next Cray"
	- Cray, in response to Apple's request to buy a Cray
		supercomputer to design the next Macintosh, 1986

Attachment: pgpXFGuaCYXzQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature