- To: Peter Hardy <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [chat] Re: [SLUG] MS to charge for FAT file system
- From: mlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:36:05 +1100
- Cc: slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:21:48PM +1100, Peter Hardy wrote:
> (I'm assuming this was meant for the list in general, not just me)
Yes, thanks.
> That was pretty much my point - I don't think there are.
There's UDF : http://www.osta.org/specs/
This was originally for those magneto-optical disks
of yesteryear; but I think cdrw uses it too.
I don't know much more about it except the stuff
I'm reading now on that website.
> NTFS strikes
> me as excessive for the sizes CF supports, and with MS on a licencing
> spree, it's only delaying the inevitable.
Well hopefully most manufacturers can restrict themselves
to the original format. However this may be too onerous
in that it might restrict you to fat12, with 8.3 file
names.
Matt
PS. See recent slashdot discussion on this story (4 Dec 2003)