RE: [chat] Re: [SLUG] Benefits of source distro(Gentoo)somewhatelusive :-)

["Ben de Luca" <c9415120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was talking about people being offensive, when they couldn't argue
with logic any more. You implied that those who seek optimization from
their systems to an extent greater than you believe is necessary are
wankers. So whilst you did not specifically label me you did categories
me as a wanker?

What offends me is that you have the never to think that your opinion is
the one true way. And that those who differ from your beliefs are less
than you are. 



-----Original Message-----
From: slug-chat-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:slug-chat-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of invisible ink
Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2003 12:05 AM
To: Ben de Luca; slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [chat] Re: [SLUG] Benefits of source
distro(Gentoo)somewhatelusive :-)

invisible ink:

> Ben de Luca:
> 
> > Calling some one a wanker is calling some one a wanker.
> 
> I used the indefinite 'you', plural. As Jaq said, you need a new
parser.

In fact, fry my memory, I didn't even use the indefinite 'you'. Get a
grip,
sunshine!

- ii

-- 
  Penguinillas Pack GNUzis
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug-chat