- To: Matthew Palmer <mjp16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [chat] Re: Federal Open Source Legislation Democrats to introduce IT Bill
- From: Alan L Tyree <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Jul 2003 08:22:44 +1000
- Cc: Slug Chat <slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 08:14, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2003, Craig Warner wrote:
<SNIP>
> Although saying "We will only use OSS" in a piece of legislation does suck
> to some degree, it really is the only way to give OSS a decent chance. If
> you say "pick on merit", you can rest assured that the decision makers will
> be merited to death in strip clubs and brothels all over the Bahamas by
> lock-in software vendors.
If by "OSS" they actually mean the software, then I agree. But there is
a *very* strong argument that all government documents should be held in
an open format. It is totally unacceptable that access to public
documents should be at the whim of a foreign monopoly. I believe that
this consideration was one that was driving the Chinese push.
Cheers,
Alan
<SNIP>
--
------------------------------------------------------
Alan L Tyree
http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel: +61 2 4782 2670
Mobile: +61 405 084 990
Fax: +61 2 4782 7092