- To: craigw@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [chat] Federal Open Source Legislation Democrats to introduce IT Bill
- From: Raena Lea-Shannon <raen7@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:14:29 +1000
- Cc: slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: raen7@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: KMail/1.5.1
This and the SA propsed legislation is too focused on the idea of cutting
costs to Govt by compelling them to use what is to them perceptibly cheap
software. This seems imho to be a purely politically motivated attempt to
close the gate after the horse has bolted. It panders to public complaints
about over spending without actually taking responsibility for it and
distracts attention to a *sexy* aletrnative.
It has been fairly well publicised that all Govts stuffed up their IT with bad
outsourcing. This I believe was mainly due to laziness and ignorance. IT was
sloughed off to *outsourcerers* with no oversight of projects from anyone
within the Govt Depts ensuring the task was economically and technically
fulfilled. Just because Govts are compelled by some law to adopt what is
perceived as "free" they have missed the original notion that this does not
mean Free as in Free Beer Most Govts and for that matter Journalists seem to
have never heard of Richard Stallman. I guess Linus Torvalds and Linux is a
better grab. Anyway, a bad IT solution will blow out budgets whether it is
opensource or proprietry.
IMO a better focus for legislators and would be on improving competition
between open source and proprietry software and the quality and availability
and cost of all software development by passing amendments to the Copyright
Act that retired copyright in source code (ie put in public domain) in
software that is no longer supported by its proprietors and shortened the
overall duration of copyright in commercialy developed software. Copyright
was originally intended to reward authors of artistic works and subject
matter other than works (ie films and records) not Redmond. Giving a
multinational a monolpoly for 70 years after the death of an author (ie
Redmond drone) has had the obvious results that are before the US State
Justice Commissions.Then perhaps there would be more interoperability and M$
would not control business and govt simply by its absurd reliance on its
bloated M$ Word and Office apps. Truly free trade.
--
Raena Lea-Shannon