- To: Richard Heycock <rgh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [chat] Re: [SLUG] Reply-To:?
- From: mlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 18:32:51 +1000
- Cc: slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:52:32AM +1000, Richard Heycock wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 22:15, Tony Green wrote:
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> point taken.
To be fair there is the opposite view argued fairly
well elsewhere on the web. But I find the original
anti more convincing.
Matt
Ps. (no link, you'll have to find it your self if interested!)