- To: Matthew Palmer <mjp16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [chat] NZ Company resuses to duplicate Knoppix CDs
- From: Alan L Tyree <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 02 Jul 2003 10:52:01 +1000
- Cc: "Slug-Chat@Slug. Org. Au" <slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:23, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Jon Biddell wrote:
>
> > The following story is of interest to all Linux affecionados...
> >
> > http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3510183
> >
> > More Microsoft anti-competitive practices in the making...
>
> Honestly, I don't think it's a Microsoft thing so much as a bunch of
> clueless paranoiacs at the duplicating place. Yeah, they could be under
> pressure from microsoft, but I'm a Hanlon's Razor kind of guy.
>
But, from the article:
"Software Images general manager David Hill denied there was a
non-compete agreement with Microsoft.
But the existence of a 15-page contract with a non-compete clause was
confirmed by Microsoft competitive strategy manager Brett Roberts."
What kind of a "non-compete" clause can there be in a contract between
MS and a disk pressing company?
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> #include <disclaimer.h>
> Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
> http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug-chat
>
--
------------------------------------------------------
Alan L Tyree
http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel: +61 2 4782 2670
Mobile: +61 405 084 990
Fax: +61 2 4782 7092