[chat] Re: [SLUG] can someone reply

[Mary <mary-slug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Apologies to slug-chat for another cast-off SLUG thread, but I don't
think meta-list-tech-policy discussion is all that interesting for slug@

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003, Dave Airlie wrote:
> 
> Received: from sbt.net.au (echidna.sbt.net.au [203.42.34.53])
>         by maddog.slug.org.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 1412A10A443
>         for <slug@xxxxxxxxxxx> ; Sun,  1 Jun 2003 22:41:56 +1000 (EST)
> Received: from 210.49.76.118 (echidna.sbt.net.au [203.42.34.53]) by
>     sbt.net.au
>         (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20030601223537-65200-7 ;
>         Sun, 01 Jun 2003 22:35:37 -1000
> 
> the above looks suspicious to me .. the IP hostname and reverse IP are
> different...

It's Mailman that's holding his mails for approval, not Postfix. As far
as I know, checking for a valid reverse is a Postfix thing, Postfix
would just bounce the mail - these are being held for approval (and a
message is sent notifying him of that) rather than simply being bounced.

-Mary