Re: [chat] Flame wars...

[mlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:12:59AM +1000, Mary wrote:
>  [ ... ]
> Are people really unhappy with the current signal-to-noise ratio of
> slug, or with the committee's contribution to the list? If not, I'm not
> sure filtering etc are required.

I think the current S/N is ok.

The only thing that _really_ works is the example
of others.

Matt