Re: [chat] Re: [SLUG] linmagau - April edition

[invisible ink <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kevin Waterson:

> That is because they react without knowing. So, here to balance up is a
> little mail from me, from this list, when linmagau was beginning.........

That's great, but your latest email was still disappointingly negative.
That's why people responded the way they did. I do remember your earlier
post about linmagau (I checked the archives to make sure), and it's the
reason why I mentioned your contributions and history with SLUG during the
thread - the negativity of your post didn't jibe with your usual posts.

> hope that keeps you all cheery till the next person dare mention they are
> not satisfied with something and you can vent your frustrations on them.

I really hope that, in future, criticisms on the list are made positively,
within context. I'm not venting frustrations - I'm suggesting a better way
to communicate your suggestions/thoughts so that people will listen and do
something about them.

> > Ages. I'm not sure why you're asking (or why this point is important).
> You mentioned it, I thought you might think it relevent in some way.

Yeah, see above (and the comment in context, if you didn't understand it in
the first mail).

- ii

-- 
  Penguinillas Pack GNUzis