- To: Penguinillas <slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [chat] CLI Version of Windows?
- From: Lester Cheung <lcheung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:22:31 +1000
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
What about adding Linux binary compatibility like BSDs?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 06:58:14PM +1000, invisible ink wrote:
> According to Rob Short, the vice-president of Windows Core Technology, there
> may be a CLI-only version of Windows in the wings...
>
> Q: Why is there no command line only version?
>
> A: We're looking longer term to see what can be done, looking at the
> layers and what's available at each layer and how do we make it much
> closer to the thing the Linux guys have -- having only the pieces you
> want running. That's something Linux has that's ahead of us, but we're
> looking at it. We will have a command line-only version, but whether
> it'll have all the features in is another matter. A lot of the tools
> depend on having the graphical interface. Printing, for example,
> requires all the graphics subsystems because we have the "what you see
> is what you get" model. You need to have the whole of the display stuff
> to render it. It's a very tangled subsystem.
>
> Fear. Interesting article though, covers a lot of competitive points, and
> how MS is actually having to do a lot of work to keep up / match / overtake
> the Linux world...
>
> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2133899,00.html
>
> - ii
>
> --
> Penguinillas Pack GNUzis
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug-chat
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
gpg key: http://karl.dnsalias.com[port 1337]/~lcheung/gpg.pub
-lestercheung