SLUG Mailing List ArchivesAt 23/08/2002 15:38, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:30:59PM +1000, Jon Biddell wrote: > > > >Considering ISO-8859-1 and us-ascii are the only two character sets we > >*want* to allow, well, there goes that idea. > > aqt the risk of being pedantic, why ISO-8859-1 ??? Why not block > everything except us-ascii ?? Because ISO-8859-1 is a perfectly reasonable encoding for English?
D'Oh !!! Sorry - not enough caffine....:-)