- To: slug-chat@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chat] LGPL license w/o GPL infection
- From: invisible ink <jdub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Oct 15 18:20:02 2001
- Reply-by: Thu Oct 18 18:15:17 EST 2001
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
begin Andre Pang quotation:
> Exactly. The one big reason I'm still considering using the LGPL is
> because it's more well-recognised than the MPL or the Artistic License,
> even though I feel the latter two are more appropriate for my wishes. I'm
> not even thinking about coming up with my own license because of all the
> legalese you have to know, and I'm confident that between one of the three
> licenses I mentioned above, I'll find what I'm looking for.
How about that LGPL + grants I mentioned earlier?
- ii
--
Penguinillas Pack GNUzis